Week 4 Thlog
I had
never heard of the “reverse outline” before Monday’s class. The concept has
never been discussed by any high school or college professors. But I find it to
be a very helpful tool. Being someone who tends to go off on a tangent when writing,
the reverse outline will be very useful in future writing. I am one of those
writers that accidentally adds way too much unnecessary information, which is
usually one of the things that causes points to be docked off my assignments.
But the reverse outline can help me easily pick out the unnecessary tidbits in
my papers. Being able to use it to see if your paper matches up with your
thesis statement is also really helpful so you can see if you need to adjust
your thesis to your paper or vice versa.
When we
did the short activity on Wednesday where we were asked to think of questions
about the “melted bottle” scenario, I had no idea what its purpose was at
first. But when Zack then asked us to come up with certain disciplines that
would ask these specific questions, the lesson started to make sense. I thought
it was fascinating when we talked about how every discipline asks a different
question about a specific situation For example, imagine a murder scene in
which someone robbed a store and then shot the cashier. A psychologist might
ask why the robber felt compelled to kill the victim even after he got all the
money. An anthropologist might use this situation to ask a bigger question as
to why murders have seemed to have increased in the United States. The
perspective that all disciplines take on a situation are completely different,
and their questions help to find different solutions, all of which are relevant
to society. I am kind of excited about Writing Project Two because I am
interested in analyzing these different perspectives.
No comments:
Post a Comment