PB1A:
Convincing People to Like You in 140
Characters or less
Twitter has
become a media sensation that has recently branched out to a much larger personelle,
particularly young adults, teens, and celebrities and political figures, within
the last five years. Other social media networks are just as popular, like
Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat for example, but they all have more restrictive
qualities: Facebook posts are likely to be seen by relatives since it is more
popular with older generations, Instagram requires posting a photo in order to express
words, and a Snapchat story lasts 24 hours with a word capacity even less than
Twitter’s. The ability to quickly express one’s feelings to a more relatable
audience and keep up with celebrities’ daily activities has caused its global
rise in popularity.
A tweet in itself
is such a specific genre, but there are underlying subgenres that determine the
purpose, the context, and the tone. The subtweet is a tweet made regarding a
follower on twitter with the intention of that person seeing it. A subtweet
usually has a negative connotation; most of the time it is made out of anger or
disrespect. One might subtweet about how a friend betrayed her, or the fact
that one of her followers “gets around”. The name of the “victim” is never
displayed, but the typer knows that the recipient will get the message once
he/she sees it. In other words, a subtweet is basically an immature tactic for
starting conflicts. The intended audience is one, unfortunate or possibly
deserving person, and the purpose is not to exploit this person’s actions but
to provoke a desired reaction out of him/her.
A similar
subgenre is the ornery “life-lesson” style. This kind of tweet is usually made
on a bad day, when someone is going through a rough patch, either long- or
short-term. Sometimes one has just had an Epiphone, a realization about life.
Other times it is just a result of deep reflection of a certain experience. Not
all “life-lesson” tweets are negative. Some are motivating, encouraging its
readers to work harder in school, work, or relationships in order to meet goals
and find happiness. Others are warnings, telling one’s readers not to fall in
love or not to trust people because they will always let you down in the end.
Essentially a life-lesson tweet is not really offering advice to other people
but actually a subconscious reminder to the maker himself. These tweets are
usually longer than other subgenres and more descriptive.
Arguably the most
widely-used style is the funny tweet. These tweets are the most simple and
usually short in length. People make these tweets just to get a laugh out of
people and increase their chances of getting likes. Many involve severe
sarcasm, as sarcastic humor has become a huge trend in recent years. They also
usually have something to do with the writer himself; it might tell of a funny
event that happened to him today or a humorous observation he has made.
Unfortunately, younger-generation humor has become politically or sexually
offensive to many people, but the inappropriateness is supposedly why it’s
funny. Either way, most funny tweets are light-hearted with no intention of
deliberately hurting anyone’s feelings but simply to make the writer more
likeable.
The last subgenre
is the purely promotional tweet, which is mainly used by celebrities—up-and
coming or already established—and important political figures. Often times artists
will tweet about their recently released albums and presidential candidates
will promote their campaigns. This tweet style is mostly informational, with
some possible emotional aspects to increase the fanbase.
As diverse as
these tweet styles may be, they all have the same basic underlying features and
limitations. Most tweets of all styles make use of the hashtag, which was
originally made to connect people interested in certain current trends but is
too often abused and overused. All tweets use pathos to captivate its
followers, whether it encourages anger, laughter, or happiness. One hundred
percent of people’s tweets are just highly edited versions of themselves.
People try to seem cooler, funnier, wiser than they actually are so they can
seem more likeable or to increase their follower fanbase. Essentially, all
tweets face the same constraints. Every thought that one wants to jot down must
be expressed in 140 characters or less, which usually leads to a much more
edited, controlled thought than the one that emerged in his/her mind. But the
biggest limitation is the peer pressure imposed by one’s audience. The main
intention behind a tweet is to get likes, so the writer will be motivated to
write something that appeals to his/her readers and to avoid a subject that is
publicly frowned upon. A tweet is only a fraction of one’s thoughts.
Hey Jordan! I’m really glad that you decided to tackle the tweet as your subject for this PB. I considered it myself, but I found the broadness of it daunting, and I applaud you for taking it on. I thought you did a really good job of describing the specific conventions of each different “subgenre” of tweets. Even though they’re all tweets, you differentiated between the various types and demonstrated an understanding of how two tweets can have completely different intentions. I also liked how you tied together all of the subgenres at the end by describing the unique conventions of tweets in general that often limit what we can and can’t say on Twitter. Overall, I thought you displayed a firm understanding of conventions while still writing an essay that flowed nicely and was very personable.
ReplyDelete